New Beginnings: Separating the Psyche

Photo by Kyrie kim on Unsplash

New beginnings are not just dates, but psychological revolutions. The first day of anything spurs something magical; the first Monday of the month, the first day of spring, the first day of the year. What if, this ‘magic’ is not mythical, but, a deep psychological mechanism that allows our minds to carve new selves from old failures? Why is it that we feel a particular way about these kinds of landmarks, and what does that say about our attitude to motivation, failure and imperfection?

Research by Dai and colleagues explores why we feel motivated by landmarks that signal new beginnings; that we use them to set goals, and these are amplified by mental architecture. The symbolic representation of these kind of ‘first’ landmarks allow people to psychologically separate from their imperfect past self and ignites the motivation required to initiate goals. It’s a clean slate illusion, and it’s powerful.

Failure often feels like a personal flaw; the lack of discipline or resilience, but perhaps it’s not that we lack motivation, but we are caught in a current drifting between who we were and who we want to be. It is not linear. The dates that signify beginnings serve as natural psychological cleavers that create a mental distance large enough between the current self and the imperfect past self; the further the distance, the softer the sting of failure and the more vivid the desired self becomes. This means that motivation is not just commanded by willpower, but is unlocked by context and how one’s own mind frames time. Landmarks offer the rupture  from the ordinary; a springboard for change.

It is not time itself that acts as the motivator but the way people choose to narrate it to themselves. For example, if New Year’s Day is personally significant, people will be more likely to engage with goal-related content compared to if a person deems it as ‘just another day’. It is not that people act when conditions are optimal, but when moments feel symbolically clean and the identity of time has changed. It is less about effort and more about whether the mind feels it has permission to start again. The beauty of the phenomenon is that new beginnings can stem from anything and aren’t limited to a calendar.

Birthdays, anniversaries or big life transitions such as moving house or starting a new job can also act as a psychological partition between the old and new selves. A landmark that resonates personally or socially and signifies a beginning naturally inspires a motivational shift. Why? Because it reshapes our sense of identity continuity. Allowing belief in a meaningful break from the ordinary invites the distance from the old self, framing everything as a continuation from the day before only keeps that past self psychologically close. In this mental reframe, the meaning of failure itself changes from a negativity to a story cue; a transitional frame.

A psychological reframe holds weight; when landmarks don’t only shift what a person does but who they believe themselves to be. Willpower becomes obsolete when compared to the way something is framed, the way people narrate their lives has more impact than sheer perseverance.  How often are people aware of the close proximity of their past selves? What happens when they allow that distance to grow?

Temporal landmarks may be masks for deeper motivational mechanisms, such as accountability and social expectation. Motivation is not hidden within the self but is structured by how identity and time is framed. Goals may be more easily set at a time that feels significant, allowing the symbolic representation of the reset button.

From a depth psychology perspective, the power of temporal landmarks suggests that we don’t just want a fresh start but psychic permission to disown parts of ourselves. The shadow is the rejected, inconvenient or shameful parts of the psyche, where our past failures exist. If time feels continuous, the shadow remains in close proximity, reminding us of past failings. Landmarks serve as a ritualised psychic separation, allowing a temporary exile of the shadow to create relief, clarity and momentum. The feeling of relief from this separation poses another question – are there unmet parts of the self, or imperfections, that need integrating? While distancing the past self from the present self may increase motivation, problems may occur later if the aspects of the self, like our unmet needs and desires, are ignored. They will, inevitably, return. Real transformation lies in the conscious choice of moments that both honour the break and reclaim the wisdom learned by our failings. A new beginning is not only about becoming someone else, but by renegotiating our relationship with who’s already there.

Find the full research article published in Psychological Science, Volume 26, 2015, by following this link: Put Your Imperfections Behind You - Hengchen Dai, Katherine L. Milkman, Jason Riis, 2015

Follow The Heretic for discussions on goal setting, self-acceptance and the real mechanisms behind motivation