Christmas Ideology: A Catalyst for Distress

Photo by Nathan Anderson on Unsplash

There’s a quiet tension over the Christmas period, a time marketed as joyful and restorative, impossible to avoid lifted spirits through ritualistic cheer, but this doesn’t quite ring true for everyone. In fact, the festive season is not universally joyful, but can be a catalyst for psychological distress; a wellbeing test disguised as a holiday. When we look deeper, as research by Randy and Lori Sansone, 2011, suggests, the cultural narratives surrounding Christmas may not make us psychologically healthier, but actually amplify existing distress in both individuals and communities.

In the 2011 paper reviewing psychiatric data across the Christmas period, the social narrative, that mental health improves over the holidays, suicide rates drop and people feel more connected, is far more complex than the image people choose to believe. The picture is paradoxical: for some, the festive season does bring warmth, belonging and meaning, but for others loneliness is sharpened, and grief, shame and anxiety feel heavier than ever.

The pressure to feel good can be harmful, intensifying suffering rather than relieving it, resulting in a culture that has become complicit. Christmas has become a psychological performance led by the script of generosity, gratitude and togetherness that, to someone without the means (financially, physically or emotionally), can feel misaligned. If one’s inner experience doesn’t match this script, it opens up the gap even further, not just leading to feelings of sadness, but of wrongness and of not belonging.

It is not the case that the holidays themselves create distress, but act more as a psychological amplifier to mental health problems that are already present. Depression, anxiety, relationship strain and unresolved grief all become louder when expectations rise, and the emotional cost of forced happiness is rarely discussed, especially when it appears that everyone else is experiencing something meaningful.

In a professional setting, positivity is often regarded a virtue. Optimism is praised, resilience celebrated and emotional discomfort is silently managed away. When Christmas rolls around again, this dynamic is magnified through end-of-year messages of gratitude and reflection, teams are encouraged to finish the year on a ‘strong’ note, exacerbated by festive rituals and staff parties assuming collective celebration. Outwardly, this may appear as a motivational approach,  but to those barely holding it together, can be the final straw. Why? When society preaches mandatory happiness, suffering goes underground; people delay seeking help, they minimise their pain, they wait until after the holidays to let themselves collapse under the weight.

This is not weakness – it’s a predictable psychological response to misalignment.

One of the most prominent implications of the ‘Christmas effect’ is how harshly loneliness is exposed. Loneliness is not just the absence of people, but the absence of being seen. If all a person consumes for a month (or longer) is advertisements focusing on togetherness, colleagues discussing long family holiday plans and a culture reminding us of traditions, the reminders of what’s missing or who has been lost may no longer be able to sit in their periphery. A lonely person is reminded that they are alone when it’s insisted that they shouldn’t be.

Naturally, it is human to suffer more in the colder months, especially in areas of the world affected by reduced daylight, disrupted routines and changes in sleep, and not forgetting the holiday season encouraging alcohol consumption and late nights. Biological shifts certainly have an effect on mood, but the addition of meaning embedded in Christmas time coaxes out the human desire to attach significance to endings, milestones and rituals. It prompts comparison between one’s old self from this year and the new self for the next, inviting questions of self-expectation; ‘Am I who I thought I’d be by now?’.

The milestone of the end of the year becomes a reckoning; which goals were unmet, which careers have plateaued, which relationships are under strain. The myth of a ‘fresh start’ looms as the pressure of unfinished business increases. It is not a surprise that distress cannot help but surface.

Psychological safety is not created through insistence that everyone feels good, but through allowing people to feel with honesty; acknowledging that the same season that sparks joy and connection can also be a reminder of grief and isolation. Sometimes, all at once. A person does not have to be okay simply because it’s Christmas.

Christmas is not merely a social event, as depth psychology acknowledges; it’s an archetypal activation. Rituals and symbols stir the unconscious, the emphasis on harmony, goodness and innocence evoke the unaddressed needs and the shadow. Whatever does not fit the image (be that resentment, envy or emptiness0 does not disappear, it waits. It waits until it emerges, unaffected by conscious restraint, as a temper, a conflict, or a sudden psychological collapse. The psyche, as it seeks wholeness, does not compute ‘goodness’. A culture that insists on light without darkness will only encourage the darkness to rebel. The environment of Christmas realises the psyche’s demand for integration; healing does not come from cheerfulness, but by making room for what has been disowned.

For the full paper review published in Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 2011, find the link here: The Christmas Effect on Psychopathology - PMC

Follow The Heretic for more reflections on psychological wellbeing and further impacts of social and cultural expectations